Skip to main content

The Centrality of the Gospel in the Summons

 

    I have been reflecting on the clear distinction that exists between a healthy biblical church and an unhealthy one. Large crowds do not necessitate that a church is devoid of Spiritual vitality, just as a small church does not guarantee spiritual depth. Numbers do not mean compromise, and poverty does not mean piety. At the heart of every biblical church should be the centrality of the gospel. But what does that truly mean? Moreover,  what does that even look like? I believe it begins in the pulpit and, more specifically, the man filling the pulpit. My friend Adam Hughes (pastor, theologian, and professor) is fond of saying, “If there’s a mist in the pulpit, then there will be a fog in the pew.” If the man of God shepherding the congregation hasn’t a clue, then that cluelessness is amplified. Essentially, the spiritual health and depth of the congregation as a whole will never exceed that of its leadership. Puritan Richard Baxter charged pastors when he wrote, “You have undertaken the conduct, under Christ, of a band of his soldiers, against principalities, powers, and spiritual wickedness in high places. . . . If you miscarry, they and you may perish.”[1]

    I bet you’re wondering: What, then, does this have to do with the centrality of the gospel? My answer is everything! Mark Dever, in his book Nine Marks of a Healthy Church, offers as one of his marks simply–The Gospel. He wrote, “The belief that Jesus enjoins is not a mere mental assent; it is believing in and fully relying on the good news of salvation.”[2] The gospel must be the central focus of every man of God who fills the office of shepherd. It is the gospel that justifies, it is the gospel that sanctifies, it is the gospel that restores, and it is the gospel that transforms. Let’s take a moment to reflect on how preaching should connect to the justification, sanctification, restoration, and transformation of the life of the hearer.

Justifying Gospel

    The summons of the text naturally draws toward the redemptive nature of the cross. Therefore, the philosophical perspective must be present in the expositor’s mind with the cross in mind. Bryan Chapell contended, “Accurate expositors use both a magnifying glass and a fish-eye lens, knowing that a magnifying glass can unravel mysteries in a raindrop but can fail to expose a storm gathering on the horizon.”[3] The summons must align with a grander redemptive view to ensure consistency with Scripture. This redemption compels the hearer to respond to God’s redemptive plan—confirmed through the person and work of Christ.

Sactifying Gospel

    Too often, we forget that the greatest need of the believer lies in the power of the gospel. The gospel justifies, but the gospel also sanctifies. Hershel York and Bert Decker expounded upon this conviction when they asserted, “We [do not] just want them to know the truth; we want them to do the truth. Our conclusion, therefore, should reflect that commitment.”[4] It is insufficient to provide head knowledge without compelling the response toward greater godliness from the hearer. Therefore, the preacher must be moved by the text in order to present the call of the summons to gently move the congregation towards action. Sanctification through the Word of God is essential to the believer’s spiritual growth and transformation. Sanctification is being set apart for God, becoming holy, and aligning one’s life with his will. The Word of God is central to this process, serving as the foundation for moral guidance, spiritual renewal, and a deeper relationship with God.

Restoring Gospel

    Within the core of the gospel of Jesus Christ lies the theological goal of restoration. The restorative nature of the gospel centers on the renewal of the heart (Ez 36:26), the reconciliation with God (2 Cor 5:18–19), and the receipt of a new identity and purpose (Luke 15:22–24). The restoring gospel seeks and saves broken humanity for the purpose of Christ’s glory. The gospel is not just about forgiveness of sins but also about restoration and, ultimately, transformation. Yet, we can see evidence in Scripture that God’s chosen means is centered around the ministry of the Word. This commends us to the primacy of preaching in the local church. John Broadus asserted, “In every age of Christianity, since John the Baptist drew crowds into the desert, there has been no great religious movement, no restoration of Scripture truth, and reanimation of genuine piety, without new power in preaching, both as cause and as effect.”[5]

Transforming Gospel

    The gospel, by its very nature, transforms. Gospel transformation occurs in four aspects: teaching, correction, rebuking, and training in righteousness. Paul declares that “God inspires all Scripture and is profitable for teaching, for rebuking, for correcting, for training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work” (2 Tim 3:16-17). When Paul says “teaching,” he alludes to the means of instruction. To teach is to impart truth from teacher to pupil. Paul’s specific use here is for instruction in Christian doctrine, with the expectation of application in the believer’s life. We are the pupils of God’s instruction; therefore, Scripture is profitable for that end.

    So, when Paul transitions to “rebuking,” Paul asserts the sharpness of Scripture intended to correct someone’s behavior, attitude, or actions. Other translations use the word “conviction,” which more clearly identifies the intended purpose of Paul’s writing. The Word of God convicts of sin. This position aligns with the author of Hebrews’ assertion, “For the Word of God is living and effective and sharper than any double-edged sword, penetrating as far as the separation of soul and spirit, joints and marrow. It can judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12). This conviction goes to the very thoughts of man with the intended purpose of setting right what is wrong. The Bible offers conviction that leads to repentance.

    Then Paul moves to “correction.” His purpose is to change, making right what is wrong. In particular, the Greek here conveys the idea of something being returned to its original condition. For example, if you take a piece of aluminum foil, wrap it around your food, and then, when you are done with the food, straighten it back to its original condition, the distinction in Paul’s writing points to the restorative work of the Word of God.

    Finally, Paul moves to “training in righteousness.” The idea that goes through Timothy’s mind is training and instructing children. The intended purpose of classical education in the Roman world of the New Testament was to produce productive citizens who accepted society’s values. That connection would not have been lost on Timothy. Paul advocates a classical Christian education that produces productive citizens of heaven, completely devoted to Christ.

 When the Word of God saturates the preacher’s heart, then the passion of the transformation cannot help but exude from the sermon. This saturation is what John Owen referred to as the glory of Christ in his person. He wrote, “When we read Scripture, we must always bear in mind that the revelation and doctrine of the person of Christ and His office are the foundation of all that we learn from the prophets and apostles. Deny this, and the Scriptures will no longer become a revelation of the glory of God in the salvation of the church.”[6]

Conclusion

    When pastors embrace the posture of the Good Shepherd, congregations experience both safety and truth. Shepherd-theologians shape ministries that are relationally warm and theologically rich—a combination that forms resilient disciples. The goal of faithful biblical expostions is to demonstrate how to study Scripture, emulate Christ as the standard and goal for our lives, and offer both truth and grace. We must press on with open hands and expectant hearts, knowing that every text offers gospel justification, gospel sanctification, gospel restoration, and gospel transformation.



[1] Richard Baxter, “The Reformed Pastor,” in The Practical Works of the Rev. Richard Baxter, ed. William Orme (London: James Duncan, 1830), 14:207.

[2] Mark Dever, The Nine Marks of a Healthy Church, third edition (Wheaton: Crossway, 2013) 100.

[3] See Bryan Chapell, “Redemptive-Historic View,” in Gibson and Kim, Homiletics and Hermeneutics, 5.

[4] Hershael W. York and Bert Decker, Preaching with Bold Assurance: A Solid and Enduring Approach to Engaging Exposition (Nashville: B & H, 2003), 188.

[5] John Albert Broadus, A Treatise on the Preparation and Delivery of Sermons, ed. Edwin Charles Dargan (New York: Hodder & Stoughton, 1898), 3.

[6] John Owen, The Glory of Christ, ed. R. J. K. Law (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1994), 31.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Substance-Structure-Spirit-Summons Model of Text-Driven Exposition

  Text-driven expositional preaching transcends style but serves as a lightning rod for the conviction that the Holy Spirit speaks through the text. Moreover, the text of Scripture informs the sermon’s meaning through the substance, structure, spirit, and summons. Therefore, a faithful, expository preacher must represent the text—employing explanation, illustration, and application—in the same manner of persuasion as the original author and allow the text’s nature to drive the sermon’s meaning. [1] I. A. Richards wrote, “Persuasion is only one among the aims of discourse. [Exposition] is concerned to state a view, not to persuade people to agree or to do anything more than examine it.” [2] The text-driven model demonstrates that exposition alone cannot move the congregation toward further godliness. Instead, complete dependence upon the Holy Spirit through recreating the original declaration of the text lies at the heart of text-driven preaching’s conviction that God has spoken. ...

Different Not Weird: Engaging Gen Z and Beyond with the Gospel

                                One of the most significant challenges within each generation of the church is adapting to engage with the next generation. The values that impacted the “ Boomer Generation” (1955–1965), “Generation X” (1966–1977), “Millennials” (1978–1994), and “Generation Z” (1995–2012) vary wildly. [1] However, knowing which values are essential helps contextualize the gospel, revealing its relevance to the person to whom you are speaking. This approach moves beyond just engaging Gen Z. This article strives to illuminate the values of Gen Z and provide conversation points for bridging the gap and connecting to Christ. Understanding the Gen Z Culture To reach Gen Z with the gospel begins with a critical understanding of their culture. Understanding the culture of Gen Z gives clues into what they have deemed to value. Gen Z has been identified as the most racially diverse generation and ...

How the Summons of the Text Plays Out in Reading the Bible

Considering the summons, the single greatest need of the non-believer is the gospel of Jesus Christ. Coincidentally, the single greatest need of the believer is the gospel of Jesus Christ. Both applications rest firmly within the summons of each passage of Scripture. The most significant issue then lies in the call of the text to respond. The summons—reproof, rebuke, and exhortation—is a call to the emotions and will, not just to inform the mind.  The summons is pleading, persuading, and urging the hearer to respond in obedience to the Word of God by anchoring to the effect of Scripture upon the whole person. The summons precedes the suggestions of a personal application with the definitive call of the text. Richard Baxter charged, “Next this, conclude the whole [preaching] with a practical exhortation, which must contain two parts: (1) The duty of the heart in order to a closure with Christ, and that which is contained in that closure [salvation]. (2) The use of external means for...